🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.